Earl M. Hasbrouck and Donna M. Hasbrouck - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         

               maintenance of income.  Therefore, taxable income is                   
               decreased $3,622.00 for 1992 and $1,941.00 for 1994.                   
               (c) Due to an increase in the amount of adjusted gross                 
               income for 1993, as computed at Exhibit A, no amount of                
               net operating loss deduction is available to be carried                
               from 1993 to 1990.  Consequently, the tentative                        
               allowance for 1990 is recaptured in full.                              
               In a letter dated March 18, 1996, petitioners wrote                    
          respondent and again demanded “copies of all evidence and support           
          data previously requested”.  Petitioners noted that their                   
          previous requests for the “court rulings” referenced in Ms.                 
          McConaughy’s report have been “ignored and denied by IRS action”,           
          and that the “previously requested data supporting the IRS                  
          position” was required for the “effective presentation” of                  
          petitioners’ case.                                                          
               In a letter dated March 29, 1996, to John Rigler, Problem              
          Resolution Officer with respondent's Helena office, petitioners             
          again requested information regarding the “chain of command” for            
          respondent's Appeals Office.  Petitioners stated that this                  
          information was “necessary for the preparation of our defense in            
          seeking adjudication.”                                                      
               Petitioners wrote another letter on April 23, 1996, to John            
          Rigler, again outlining their position for the “complaint before            
          the ombudsman” regarding the “professional protocol of the                  
          appeals section actions.”  Petitioners also requested the                   
          “appeals division technical operations manual outlining one-by-             
          one the procedural steps required of IRS personnel in appeals               




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011