- 15 -
personally intervene and take the appropriate
administrative action to ensure that the Hasbrouck
appeal is placed into the hands of another IRS officer
who will have the time for a responsible review.
Sometime in early December, petitioners spoke with Greg
Loendorf, Ms. Teichrow’s supervisor. On the basis of this
conversation, petitioners wrote a letter dated December 14, 1995,
to Ms. Teichrow, and stated:
To begin with, I acknowledge that your supervisor
wants you to remain on the Hasbrouck tax matter as the
appeals officer. I have no objections.
Your supervisor stated that you would be able to
schedule an appeals conference sometime during early
January. You may schedule it at your convenience.
Just give us sufficient warning so that we may include
Brian Bras.
It is my understanding that the conference is to
be held prior to the time any ninety day letter is
issued. It is also my understanding that, prior to the
time the conference is held, some responsible
individual is going to see to it that Brian Bras and I
finally have the opportunity to review the citations of
law and/or authority we requested long, long ago in
support of the tax examiner’s so-called “findings.” It
is of extreme urgency we have the opportunity to review
this data prior to the time of any conference because
not one person involved in this dispute really
understands that basis for McConaughy’s allegations.
* * * * * * *
Please see to it we receive the IRS support data.
In a letter dated December 19, 1995, Ms. Teichrow responded
to petitioners’ December 14, 1995, letter, as follows:
I spoke with my supervisor, Greg Loendorf, yesterday,
since my understanding of your conversation with him
was not the same as recited in your letter dated
December 14, 1995.
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011