- 3 -
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
said sum be paid for not less than ten (10) years
commencing July, 1987, and each first (lst) day of the
month thereafter; provided, however, that upon the
expiration of * * * [petitioner's] child support
obligation, the amount of alimony to be paid to * * *
[Mary Kay Nelson] by * * * [petitioner] shall be
increased the next following month and each month
thereafter to the sum of One Thousand Six Hundred
Dollars ($1,600.00), together with two per cent (2%)
poundage.
The above alimony obligation shall terminate upon
the death of * * * Mary Kay Nelson. * * * [Petitioner]
shall provide and maintain a policy of decreasing
principal term life insurance upon his life in an
amount equal to the decreasing balance of the alimony
obligation set forth above. Mary Kay Nelson shall be
named as beneficiary on said policy.
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties hereto
* * * Mary Kay Nelson, hereby waives and releases any and
all rights to further or additional sums of alimony to be
paid by * * * [petitioner].
In separate sections of the divorce decree, personal and business
marital property was divided between petitioner and his former
spouse.
Apparently, Mary Kay Nelson remarried and became employed
after the effective date of the divorce decree. Based upon those
reasons, petitioner sought relief from above-cited alimony
provisions of the divorce decree. In 1989 he filed a motion for
relief in the court that issued the divorce decree (the divorce
court). His motion was denied upon the ground that the divorce
court no longer had jurisdiction over the matter. In an order
filed June 11, 1989, denying petitioner's motion, the divorce
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011