- 3 - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that said sum be paid for not less than ten (10) years commencing July, 1987, and each first (lst) day of the month thereafter; provided, however, that upon the expiration of * * * [petitioner's] child support obligation, the amount of alimony to be paid to * * * [Mary Kay Nelson] by * * * [petitioner] shall be increased the next following month and each month thereafter to the sum of One Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($1,600.00), together with two per cent (2%) poundage. The above alimony obligation shall terminate upon the death of * * * Mary Kay Nelson. * * * [Petitioner] shall provide and maintain a policy of decreasing principal term life insurance upon his life in an amount equal to the decreasing balance of the alimony obligation set forth above. Mary Kay Nelson shall be named as beneficiary on said policy. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties hereto * * * Mary Kay Nelson, hereby waives and releases any and all rights to further or additional sums of alimony to be paid by * * * [petitioner]. In separate sections of the divorce decree, personal and business marital property was divided between petitioner and his former spouse. Apparently, Mary Kay Nelson remarried and became employed after the effective date of the divorce decree. Based upon those reasons, petitioner sought relief from above-cited alimony provisions of the divorce decree. In 1989 he filed a motion for relief in the court that issued the divorce decree (the divorce court). His motion was denied upon the ground that the divorce court no longer had jurisdiction over the matter. In an order filed June 11, 1989, denying petitioner's motion, the divorcePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011