- 5 - distinguishes support from property distribution. The former is meant to provide sustenance support, while the latter involves the readjustment of the parties property rights. St Clair v. St. Clair (1983), 9 Ohio App. 3d 195; Wolfe, supra. Other criteria which courts have employed in making this distinction are whether the award is for a definite sum and if it is not subject to contingencies. Vaught v. Vaught (1981), 2 Ohio App. 3d 264; Bean v. Bean (1983), 14 Ohio App. 3d 358. If the periodic payments have these characteristics, they are considered to be part of the property distribution. Id. at 5. In each year in issue, in accordance with the terms of the divorce decree, petitioner paid his former spouse $19,200 ($1,600 per month x 12 months). Alimony deductions with respect to these amounts were claimed on petitioners' Federal income tax returns for those years. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the alimony deductions upon the ground that "the payments represent a property settlement." OPINION In general, an individual is allowed to deduct amounts paid as alimony during the taxable year to the individual's spouse, or former spouse. Sec. 215. A payment constitutes alimony within the meaning of section 215 if the payment is made in cash (including checks and money orders payable on demand, sec. 1.71- 1T(a), Income Tax Regs., 49 Fed. Reg. 34455(Aug. 9, 1989)), and (1) such payment is received by (or on behalf of) a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument; (2) the divorce or separationPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011