Stephen D. Podd - Page 34

                                       - 34 -                                         
          unavailable, the arm's-length consideration is determined by                
          evaluating various facts and circumstances.  Sec.                           
          1.482-2(d)(2)(iii), Income Tax Regs.                                        
               The relevant factors identified in section 1.482-2(d)(2)(iii),         
          Income Tax Regs., for determining the amount of an arm's-length             
          consideration where an adequately similar transaction is absent             
          are:8                                                                       

          8    Sec. 1.482-2(d), Income Tax Regs., was effectively                     
          superseded by sec. 1.482-4T, Temporary Income Tax Regs., 58 Fed.            
          Reg. 5263, 5287 (Jan. 21, 1993), generally effective for taxable            
          years beginning after April 21, 1993.                                       
               Additionally, sec. 482 was amended, for tax years beginning            
          after Dec. 31, 1986, by the addition of the following sentence at           
          the end thereof:  "In the case of any transfer (or license) of              
          intangible property (within the meaning of section 936(h)(3)(B)),           
          the income with respect to such transfer or license shall be                
          commensurate with the income attributable to the intangible."               
          Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100                
          Stat. 2085, 2562-2563.  The effect of the amendment to sec. 482             
          is that we may consider the actual profits realized by the                  
          transferee through its use of the intangible property.  H. Rept.            
          99-426, 425 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 425 ("The committee does           
          not intend, however, that the inquiry as to the appropriate                 
          compensation for the intangible be limited to the question of               
          whether it was appropriate considering only the facts in                    
          existence at the time of the transfer.  The committee intends               
          that consideration also be given the actual profit experience               
          realized as a consequence of the transfer.")                                
               The statutory amendment to sec. 482 is apparently in                   
          conflict with sec. 1.482-2(d)(2)(iii)(g), Income Tax Regs., which           
          provides that only the prospective profits to be realized by the            
          transferee through its use of the property may be considered in             
          the determination of the amount of an arm's-length consideration            
          (i.e., without consideration of subsequent actual profits).  See            
          Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 525, 601 (1989)                
          ("Unlike both respondent and petitioners' experts, we find little           
          relevance in B&L Ireland's actual results of operations during              
          1981 and 1982.  Such information would not have been available in           
          1980 to a potential licensee negotiating a license agreement                
          which was entered on January 1, 1981."), affd. 933 F.2d 1084 (2d            
                                                                (continued...)        




Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011