Estate of Algerine Allen Smith, Deceased, James Allen Smith, Executor - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          salary from the corporation.  Under these circumstances, the                
          court held section 1341 inapplicable because it was the                     
          corporation, rather than the taxpayer, who had previously                   
          reported the item being repaid.  Kraft v. United States, supra at           
          299.6                                                                       
               It is undisputed that petitioner, as decedent's estate,                
          stands in the same position as decedent for purposes of applying            
          section 1341.  Thus, in these cases, section 1341 relief is                 
          restricted to that part of the $681,840 that represents the                 
          royalties that decedent had personally received and reported for            
          the years 1975 through 1980.  Decedent did not receive royalties            
          paid to Jessamine and Frankie during the years 1975 through 1980,           
          nor did she report or pay tax on those amounts.  We hold that               
          only that portion of the $681,840 that represents repayment of              
          royalties previously received and reported by decedent can be               
          used to provide benefits to petitioner under section 1341.                  


          6As succinctly stated in Judge Nelson's concurring opinion:                 

                    For a taxpayer to take advantage of � 1341, he                    
               must show, among other things, (1) that 'an item' was                  
               included in a prior year's gross income because of an                  
               apparent unrestricted right to the item, and (2) that                  
               it was subsequently established that the taxpayer did                  
               not have an unrestricted right to 'such item' or                       
               portion thereof.  26 U.S.C. �� 1341(a)(1) and (a)(2).                  
               Both sections clearly speak of the same 'item.'                        
                    The 'item' included in the Krafts' gross income                   
               for the prior year at issue here was not a fee received                
               from Blue Cross; it was, rather, a salary item received                
               by Dr. Kraft from his corporation.  * * *  [Kraft v.                   
               United States, 991 F.2d 292, 300 (6th Cir. 1993).]                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011