Estate of Algerine Allen Smith, Deceased, James Allen Smith, Executor - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          of the settlement that respondent attributes to decedent's                  
          previously reported royalties.  However, the parties have                   
          stipulated that decedent reported all the royalties that she                
          received for the years 1975 through 1980.  Under these                      
          circumstances, the Rule 155 computation cannot be based on the              
          assumption that decedent received more royalty income during the            
          years 1975 through 1980 than she reported on her returns.8                  
               Based upon the available information, we find that 24                  
          percent of the $681,840 settlement, or $163,641, should be                  
          attributed to excess royalties received and reported by decedent            
          during the years 1975 through 1980.9  This $163,641 should then             
          be allocated to each of the years 1975 through 1980 in proportion           
          to the amount of gross royalties that decedent reported during              
          each of these years.  For purposes of making the computations               
          required by section 1341(a)(5), these respective amounts should             
          be reduced by the proportionate amount of depletion allowance               
          that decedent took on her 1975 through 1980 returns.  The                   
          resulting amounts should then be excluded from reported income              

          8Respondent made no argument that this aspect of the                        
          computation was an attempt to determine which portion of Exxon's            
          claims against decedent was attributable to Jessamine's                     
          royalties.  Indeed, respondent's counsel acknowledged that                  
          Jessamine's royalties could not be identified and that                      
          respondent's computations give petitioner the benefit of any                
          doubt on this point.                                                        
          9This allocation does not attribute any portion of the                      
          $681,840 settlement to interest that Exxon claimed in addition to           
          its base claim for excess royalties.  Respondent's proposed                 
          computation made no allocation of the $681,840 settlement to                
          interest and presented no arguments regarding how such an                   
          allocation should or could be made.                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011