- 36 - other representative of Xway or Interstate regarding disburse- ments from the escrow fund or any other matter relating to that fund or the escrow agreement and that all Mr. Hefferan's contacts regarding those matters were with Mr. Canty. The record also shows that Mr. Hefferan's actions with respect to the escrow fund and the escrow agreement complied with the wishes of Mr. Canty, regardless whether those actions violated certain provisions of that agreement. To illustrate, the terms of the escrow agreement did not permit any withdrawals to be made from the escrow fund except (1) to pay for any replacement property acquired by OIP; (2) to pay OIP the "Agreed Amount" as defined in paragraph 5(e)(1) of the escrow agreement within three business days after Interstate received written notice from OIP that OIP did not identify all or any of the replacement property within 45 days after July 26, 1990; (3) to pay OIP no later than five business days after the expiration of the 180-day period after July 26, 1990, any portion of the "Agreed Amount" as defined in paragraph 5(e)(2) of the escrow agreement that had not been expended by Interstate within that 180-day period to purchase replacement property or that had not previously been paid to OIP pursuant to paragraph 5(d)(1) of the escrow agreement relating to OIP's failure to identify all or any of the replacement property within 45 days after July 26, 1990; and (4) to pay any remaining portion of the escrow fund to Interstate within five days after the expiration of the 180-dayPage: Previous 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011