Florida Industries Investment Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 48




                                        - 48 -                                         
          authority for a position even where it is supported only by a                
          well-reasoned construction of the pertinent statutory provision              
          as applied to the relevant facts.  See sec. 1.6662-4(d)(3)(ii),              
          Income Tax Regs.  There may be substantial authority for more                
          than one position with respect to the same item.  See sec.                   
          1.6662-4(d)(3)(i), Income Tax Regs.                                          
               The accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) does not             
          apply to any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there            
          was reasonable cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted            
          in good faith.  See sec. 6664(c)(1).  The determination of                   
          whether a taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and in good faith             
          depends on the pertinent facts and circumstances, including the              
          taxpayer's efforts to assess his or her proper tax liability, the            
          knowledge and experience of the taxpayer, and the reliance on the            
          advice of a professional, such as an accountant.  See sec.                   
          1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  In the case of claimed reliance            
          on the accountant who prepared the taxpayer's tax return, the                
          taxpayer must establish that correct information was provided to             
          the accountant and that the item incorrectly claimed or reported             
          in the return was the result of the accountant's error.  See Ma-             
          Tran Corp. v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 158, 173 (1978).                         
               We have held above that petitioners have failed to show that            
          they are entitled to nonrecognition treatment under section 1031             
          and under section 1033.  Moreover, petitioners adduced no evi-               
          dence and make no argument with respect to the various other                 




Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011