Fred Henry - Page 37




                                        - 37 -                                         

          Willful neglect is defined as a conscious, intentional failure or            
          reckless indifference.  See United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241,            
          245 (1985).                                                                  
               We consider first whether petitioner's failure to file a tax            
          return for 1992 was due to reasonable cause and not to willful               
          neglect because of his claimed reliance on his return preparer,              
          Mr. Gargiulo.  Mr. Gargiulo advised petitioner that he was not               
          required to file a tax return for that year since he did not have            
          the amount of income that would require him to file such a tax               
          return under section 6012.  In this connection, Mr. Gargiulo                 
          testified in pertinent part about the reason why he did not                  
          believe that any portion of the $150,000 assistance payment is               
          includible in petitioner's income for 1992, as follows:                      
               There was just nothing that duPont ever told us what's                  
               that -- what kind of money it was -- whether it was a                   
               goodwill money for the problems they were causing Mr.                   
               Henry or whether it was a loan to Mr. Henry to be paid                  
               later.  The character of the money, I didn't know what                  
               it was.                                                                 
               Nothing in the record indicates that Mr. Henry, who was                 
          aware of the circumstances surrounding du Pont's decision to make            
          the $150,000 assistance to him in early February 1992, shared                
          that information with Mr. Gargiulo.  Nor does the record show                
          that Mr. Gargiulo asked du Pont to inform him of those circum-               
          stances.  On the instant record, we find that petitioner has                 
          failed to show that it was reasonable for him to rely on the                 






Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011