REDLANDS SURGICAL SERVICES - Page 62




                                       - 62 -                                         
          resolution of any matter brought before the Medical Advisory                
          Group.  Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that the               
          decisions of the Medical Advisory Committee are subject to                  
          independent review by petitioner or Redlands Hospital.                      
                    e.  Termination of Quality Assurance Activities                   
               As required by the General Partnership agreement, on April             
          30, 1990, SCA Management entered into a quality assurance                   
          agreement with RHS.  The term of the quality assurance agreement            
          was conditioned on maintenance of a specified level of surgery              
          activity in the Surgery Center.  Petitioner concedes that the               
          quality assurance agreement terminated after the first year.16              
          Although the agreement required the parties to negotiate a new              
          quality assurance agreement in the event of such a termination,             
          there is no evidence in the record that such negotiations ever              
          occurred.17                                                                 
               The termination of the quality assurance agreement vividly             
          evidences petitioner’s lack of effective control over vital                 
          aspects of the Surgery Center’s operations.  Quality assurance              


               16 The termination of the quality assurance agreement is               
          disclosed in petitioner's reply brief, filed on May 11, 1998.               
          Petitioner's counsel represent that the fact of the termination             
          of the quality assurance agreement was first disclosed to them on           
          or about Apr. 30, 1998.                                                     
               17 Under the quality assurance agreement, petitioner was               
          entitled to a fee equal to 1 percent of gross revenues,                     
          commencing in the second year.  Because the agreement terminated            
          after the first year, it appears that petitioner never received             
          any fees under the agreement.                                               




Page:  Previous  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011