Hans C. Sherrer - Page 39




                                        -39-                                          
          reasonable cause.  See Rule 142(a); United States v. Boyle, 469             
          U.S. 241, 245 (1985).                                                       
               The parties have stipulated that petitioner did not file an            
          income tax return for 1994.  Respondent has determined that                 
          petitioner did not have reasonable cause for his failure to file.           
               Having sustained respondent's determination that there was a           
          deficiency in petitioner's tax for 1994, we find that petitioner            
          was required to file a 1994 return and that he did not do so.               
               Petitioner did not argue or offer any evidence suggesting              
          that he had reasonable cause for his failure to file a 1994                 
          return.  Petitioner's arguments and evidence challenged only the            
          amount of the deficiency determined by respondent; petitioner did           
          not attempt to establish that he had cause for his failure to               
          file.  Accordingly, we find that petitioner has not shown that              
          his failure to file a 1994 return was due to reasonable cause and           
          not to willful neglect.  We therefore sustain respondent's                  
          determination of the section 6651(a)(1) addition for 1994.                  
          V.   Estimated Tax Additions for 1989-94                                    
               Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for               
          additions to tax under section 6654(a), for failure to pay                  
          estimated tax in each of the years 1989-94.  Section 6654(a)                
          provides for an addition to tax in the case of any underpayment             
          of estimated tax by an individual.  The addition to tax under               
          section 6654 is mandatory absent a showing by the taxpayer that             
          one of the statutory exceptions applies.  See Clayton v.                    
          Commissioner, 102 T.C. at 653.                                              



Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011