- 20 -
of ownership by decedent to the deposited funds in that joint
account. See RCWA 30.22.130.
Unless decedent granted Mr. Christensen and Ms. Hastie the
authority to make gifts on her behalf of the funds withdrawn from
the Seafirst joint account by the November 1995 checks and the
January 1996 checks, both Mr. Christensen and Ms. Hastie had an
obligation to account to decedent for the funds withdrawn by the
respective checks that they signed, and decedent could have sued
both of them to recover those funds. See RCWA 30.22.130; see
also Kalk v. Security Pac. Bank Wash. N.A., 866 P.2d at 1279. On
the record before us, we find that the estate has failed to show
that decedent authorized either Mr. Christensen or Ms. Hastie to
make gifts on her behalf of the funds in the Seafirst joint
account that were withdrawn by the November 1995 checks and the
January 1996 checks. Indeed, the estate does not even suggest
that any such authority existed outside the purported authority
that it claims was granted to them as joint account holders of
the Seafirst joint account by certain sections of the Act. In
this connection, the estate expressly disavows relying on the
power of attorney that decedent signed on August 15, 1984, in
order to establish that decedent authorized Mr. Christensen and
Ms. Hastie to make gifts on her behalf. We conclude that the
estate acknowledges that that power of attorney did not authorize
Mr. Christensen and Ms. Hastie to make gifts on behalf of dece-
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011