- 52 - on Mr. Zahar’s advice in claiming deductions for mortgage interest and property taxes in 1995. Gabriel testified that he provided Mr. Zahar with information about his income and told him that he and his brother were paying for “the house and the mortgage, and all the taxes and all the expenses. Food, drink, electricity.” Mr. Zahar testified that he believed Gabriel and Morhaf were supporting the Mahmoud Daya family during the years at issue and that Fuad provided additional money to the family from “time to time”. There is no evidence, however, that petitioners informed Mr. Zahar of the extent of Fuad’s contributions to the family. Yet out of a total of $32,531.88 deposited into the household account in 1995, Fuad contributed at least $18,500. Without such information, Mr. Zahar could not have determined petitioners’ entitlement to the deductions at issue and to head of household filing status. Under these circumstances, petitioners have not shown they had reasonable cause for their underpayment of taxes or acted in good faith. Accordingly, we uphold respondent’s determinations that petitioners are liable for additions to tax under section 6662(a). We have considered all other arguments advanced by petitioners, and to the extent not discussed above, have found those arguments to be irrelevant or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decisions will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Last modified: May 25, 2011