Estate of Ethel Josephine Spowart Hinz - Page 60




                                       - 60 -                                         
          excused because respondent contributed to Christy’s                         
          misunderstanding, and so Christy’s misunderstanding was                     
          reasonable.  We do not believe that Christy’s misunderstanding              
          was reasonable.  We do not believe that respondent’s failure to             
          respond more clearly and legibly23 contributed to Christy’s                 
          misunderstanding.  And we do not believe petitioner’s failure to            
          timely file the tax return was due to reasonable cause.                     
               We hold for respondent on this issue.24  See supra note 21.            
               III.  Late Payment Addition–-Secs. 6651(a)(2) and 6166                 
               Section 6651(a)(2) imposes an addition to tax of 0.5 percent           
          per month (with a maximum of 25 percent) in case of failure to              
          pay the amount shown as tax on the tax return on or before the              
          date prescribed for the payment of the tax, taking into account             
          any extension of time for payment, unless it is shown that this             

          23   On opening brief respondent states in two places that “the             
          Form 4768 is clearly stamped in blue ink ‘The Maximum Extension             
          Allowed for Filing is Six Months.’” (Emphasis added).  Respondent           
          makes substantially the same statement on answering brief.  As we           
          have found, the stamped legend is faint on the original.  The               
          exhibit the parties initially offered is a photocopy of the                 
          estate tax return.  The Form 4768 that is part of that exhibit is           
          a photocopy of the original Form 4768.  On that photocopy the               
          stamped legend is totally illegible.  Until the Court insisted              
          that the original Form 4768 be made part of the record, the                 
          parties’ respective counsels apparently were content to allow the           
          Court to proceed on the basis of the illegible photocopy.                   
          24   Because we hold that petitioner did not have reasonable                
          cause for the failure to file income tax returns, we do not need            
          to address the question of whether the failure to file was also             
          caused by willful neglect.  See sec. 6651(a); see United States             
          v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 247-248 (1985); Jackson v. Commissioner,            
          86 T.C. 492, 539 (1986), affd. 864 F.2d 1521, 1528 (10th Cir.               
          1989).                                                                      





Page:  Previous  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011