Richard J. and Melodie D. McKeever - Page 35




                                               - 35 -                                                  
                  4.  Expectation That Assets Used in the Activity Would                               
                  Appreciate in Value                                                                  
                  “The term ‘profit’ encompasses appreciation in the value of                          
            assets, such as land, used in the activity.”  Sec. 1.183-2(b)(4),                          
            Income Tax Regs.  Petitioners argue that their expectation that                            
            their ranch and their horses would appreciate in value indicates                           
            a profit motive.  Respondent disagrees for several reasons.                                
            First, respondent argues that petitioners engaged in two separate                          
            activities: petitioners bred and raised horses, and they owned a                           
            ranch.  Second, respondent argues that petitioners have produced                           
            no evidence showing that appreciation in their horses would cover                          
            their past losses.  Petitioners argue that their ranch is a                                
            business asset and that their assets (the ranch and the herd)                              
            have increased in value by approximately $500,000, thus                                    
            demonstrating that their expectation of asset appreciation is                              
            reasonable.                                                                                
                  Petitioners purchased the land primarily for reasons                                 
            related to their horse activity; profit from the property’s                                
            increase in value was a secondary consideration.  Petitioners’                             
            ownership of the ranch and their horse-related activities are                              
            considered a single activity for purposes of determining expected                          
            asset appreciation under section 1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.                           
            See Engdahl v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. at 668 n.4.                                           
                  Petitioners were in the fifth year of their horse operation                          
            when they purchased the ranch in 1991 for approximately $316,000.                          





Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011