Neonatology Associates, P.A., et al - Page 4




                                                - 4 -                                                  
            Center (Marlton) group.  The Marlton group relates to the Marlton                          
            Employee Welfare Plan (Marlton Plan), a purported welfare benefit                          
            fund formed under the NJ VEBA.4                                                            
                  In regard to each test case, respondent determined that the                          
            employer or sole proprietor could not deduct its or his                                    
            contributions to the respective plan and, in the case of                                   
            Neonatology and Lakewood, that the employee/owners had income to                           
            the extent that he or she benefited from a contribution.5                                  
            Respondent determined that each petitioner was liable for                                  
            deficiencies in Federal income tax as a result of the VEBA                                 
            determinations and that each petitioner was liable for a related                           
            accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for negligence or                           
            intentional disregard of rules or regulations.  In the case of                             
            Lakewood, respondent also determined that it was liable for a 15-                          
            percent addition to tax under section 6651(a) for failure to file                          
            timely its 1992 Federal income tax return and a section 6621                               
            increased rate of interest on its 1991 deficiency as to interest                           
            accruing after July 20, 1995.                                                              
                  Each petitioner petitioned the Court to redetermine                                  
            respondent’s determinations.  Respondent’s notices of deficiency                           


                  4 We do not decide whether this plan is a welfare benefit                            
            fund under sec. 419(e).                                                                    
                  5 Respondent also made certain other adjustments of income                           
            and expense.  Petitioners concede these adjustments, unless they                           
            are mathematical computations relating to the VEBA issues.                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011