RACMP Enterprises, Inc. - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          flatwork.  Petitioner reported as cost of goods sold the total              
          cost of all material used in its construction activity during the           
          taxable year at issue, $993,777.  This sum comprised the                    
          following amounts:                                                          
               Item                     Amount              Percentage                
               Concrete                 $642,923            64.7                      
               All other material1      334,563             33.7                      
               Lumber2                   16,291               1.6                     
               Total                    993,777             100.0                     
               1"All other material" is all the other material that went              
          into construction of the foundations and flatwork, except the               
          concrete; it includes fill sand, drain rock, and the various                
          hardware items.  According to the typical bid worksheet, the cost           
          of the hardware items is 5.07 percent of the contract price (the            
          total cost of the materials, other than concrete and fill sand,             
          $81.94 ($69.44 plus $7.70 plus $4.80) divided by the contract               
          price,$1,615.28), and 9.59 percent of the total cost of the                 
          materials ($81.94 divided by $854.74).                                      
               2Respondent stipulated that the lumber is a supply.                    
               Petitioner's accounts receivable and accounts payable at the           
          end of the taxable year at issue were $294,436 and $60,143,                 
          respectively.                                                               
                                       OPINION                                        
               We must decide whether the provision of material by                    
          petitioner in performing its service contracts is the sale of               
          "merchandise" for purposes of section 1.471-1, Income Tax Regs.             
               We decide this issue in the context of whether it was an               
          abuse of respondent's discretion to exercise his authority under            
          section 446 to require petitioner to change from the cash method            







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011