J.C. Shepherd - Page 57




                                       - 57 -                                         
          is the primary and personal liability of the donor, that the gift           
          is to be measured by the value of the property passing from the             
          donor, and that the tax applies regardless of the fact that the             
          identity of the donee may not be presently known or                         
          ascertainable.  See sec. 25.2511-2(a), Gift Tax Regs.2                      
               The majority correctly states the formula for valuing                  
          transfers of property:                                                      
               If property is transferred for less than adequate and                  
               full consideration, then the excess of the value of the                
               property transferred over the consideration received is                
               generally deemed a gift.  See sec. 2512(b).  The gift                  
               is measured by the value of the property passing from                  
               the donor, rather than by the property received by the                 
               donee or upon the measure of enrichment to the donee.                  
               See sec. 25.2511-2(a), Gift Tax Regs.  [Majority op.                   
               pp. 11-12.]                                                            
          This is exactly the formula used in the cases on which the                  
          majority relies for the proposition that a gift was made.  See              
          Kincaid v. United States, 682 F.2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982); Heringer           


               1(...continued)                                                        
               resulting to the donee from the transfer, nor is it                    
               conditioned upon ability to identify the donee at the                  
               time of the transfer.  On the contrary, the tax is a                   
               primary and personal liability of the donor, is an                     
               excise upon his act of making the transfer, is measured                
               by the value of the property passing from the donor,                   
               and attaches regardless of the fact that the identity                  
               of the donee may not then be known or ascertainable.                   
               2See also Robinette v. Helvering, 318 U.S. 184 (1943), in              
          which the taxpayer argued that there could be no gift of a                  
          remainder interest where the putative remaindermen (prospective             
          unborn children of the grantor) did not exist at the time of the            
          transfer.  The Supreme Court rejected this argument stating that            
          the gift tax is a primary and personal liability of the donor               
          measured by the value of the property passing from the donor and            
          attaches regardless of the fact that the identity of the donee              
          may not be presently known or ascertainable.                                


Page:  Previous  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011