Estate of Albert Strangi - Page 35




                                       - 35 -                                         
          Transactions made in the ordinary course of business are exempt             
          from the above gift tax provisions.  Thus, section 25.2512-8,               
          Gift Tax Regs., provides:                                                   
               However, a sale, exchange, or other transfer of                        
               property made in the ordinary course of business (a                    
               transaction which is bona fide, at arm’s length, and                   
               free from any donative intent), will be considered as                  
               made for an adequate and full consideration in money or                
               money’s worth. * * *                                                   
               The Supreme Court has described previous versions of the               
          gift tax statutes (section 501 imposing the tax on gifts and                
          section 503 which is virtually identical to present section                 
          2512(b)) in the following terms:                                            
                    Sections 501 and 503 are not disparate provisions.                
               Congress directed them to the same purpose, and they                   
               should not be separated in application.  Had Congress                  
               taxed “gifts” simpliciter, it would be appropriate to                  
               assume that the term was used in its colloquial sense,                 
               and a search for “donative intent” would be indicated.                 
               But Congress intended to use the term “gifts” in its                   
               broadest and most comprehensive sense.  H. Rep. No.                    
               708, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., p.27; S. Rep. No. 665, 72d                  
               Cong., 1st Sess., p.39; cf. Smith v. Shaughnessy, 318                  
               U.S. 176; Robinette v. Helvering, 318 U.S. 184.                        
               Congress chose not to require an ascertainment of what                 
               too often is an elusive state of mind.  For purposes of                
               the gift tax it not only dispensed with the test of                    
               “donative intent.”  It formulated a much more workable                 
               external test, that where “property is transferred for                 
               less than an adequate and full consideration in money                  
               or money’s worth,” the excess in such money value                      
               “shall, for the purpose of the tax imposed by this                     
               title, be deemed a gift...”  And Treasury Regulations                  
               have emphasized that common law considerations were not                
               embodied in the gift tax.                                              
                    To reinforce the evident desire of Congress to hit                
               all the protean arrangements which the wit of man can                  
               devise that are not business transactions within the                   






Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011