Gerald E. and Nancy J. Toberman - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
         Commissioner may support his determination on the basis of any               
         admissible evidence and need not rely on the evidence used in                
         making the administrative determination.  See Jackson v.                     
         Commissioner, 73 T.C. 394, 400 (1979).  This conclusion is a                 
         natural consequence of the well-established principle that “a                
         trial before the Tax Court is a proceeding de novo; our                      
         determination of a petitioner’s tax liability must be based on               
         the merits of the case and not any previous record developed at              
         the administrative level.”  Id. (citing Greenberg’s Express, Inc.            
         v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 324, 328 (1974)); see also Gatlin v.                
         Commissioner, 754 F.2d 921, 923 (11th Cir. 1985), affg. T.C.                 
         Memo. 1982-489.   An exception to this rule against looking                  
         behind the notice of deficiency may apply in the rare case where             
         the Commissioner introduces no substantive evidence but simply               
         rests on the presumption of correctness regarding his                        
         determination that a taxpayer has unreported income.  See Jackson            
         v. Commissioner, supra at 401.  As discussed below, this is not              
         such a case.                                                                 




              9(...continued)                                                         
          398; Day v. Commissioner, 975 F.2d 534, 537 (8th Cir. 1992)                 
          (“Courts have occasionally declined to accord a presumption of              
          correctness to a deficiency notice when the Commissioner fails to           
          introduce any substantive evidence linking the taxpayer to the              
          income generating activity in question.” (Emphasis added.)),                
          affg. in part, revg. in part on other grounds and remanding T.C.            
          Memo. 1991-140.                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011