Armin Unger - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                          
               After considering the entire record, we find nothing that               
          would support the conclusion that respondent’s determination is              
          arbitrary or excessive.  Indeed, we find the items shown in the              
          consolidated net worth calculation set out in the appendix to be             
          supported by the record.  Therefore, we sustain respondent’s                 
          determination of deficiencies in each of the years in question.              
               Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for an             
          addition to tax for fraud for each of the years 1987, 1988, 1989,            
          and 1990.  Respondent bears the burden of proof on this issue.               
          See sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b).  In order to discharge the burden,            
          respondent must prove by clear and convincing evidence that:  (1)            
          An underpayment exists for each year in issue, and (2) some                  
          portion of the underpayment for that year is due to fraud.  See              
          sec. 7454(a); Clayton v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 632 (1994);                  
          Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 699 (1989).  On the basis             
          of respondent’s net worth computation and the evidence supporting            
          it, we find that respondent has clearly and convincingly                     
          established that petitioner had taxable income on which there was            
          an underpayment of tax for each of the years in issue.                       
               In order to show that some portion of an underpayment is due            
          to fraud, respondent must also show that petitioner intended to              
          evade taxes known to be owing by conduct designed to conceal,                
          mislead, or otherwise prevent the collection of taxes.  See                  
          Stoltzfus v. United States, 398 F.2d 1002, 1004 (3d Cir. 1968);              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011