- 10 - Rowlee v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111, 1123 (1983). “Fraud * * * requires intentional wrongdoing. * * * To establish liability, the Commissioner [has] to show knowing falsehood”. Laurins v. Commissioner, 889 F.2d 910, 913 (9th Cir. 1989), affg. Norman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1987-265. The existence of fraud is a question of fact to be resolved upon consideration of the entire record. See Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 199 (1976), affd. without published opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978). Fraudulent intent is rarely established by direct evidence. As a consequence, courts have inferred fraudulent intent from various kinds of circumstantial evidence. Some of the indicia of fraud that have been recognized include: (1) Understatement of income, (2) failure to keep adequate records, (3) failure to file tax returns, (4) implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior, (5) concealing assets, (6) failure to cooperate with tax authorities, (7) engaging in illegal activities, (8) attempting to conceal illegal activities, and (9) dealing in cash. See Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-308 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601. Petitioner did all of these. While willful failure to file does not in itself establish liability for additions to tax on account of fraud, such failure may be properly considered in connection with other facts inPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011