Michael and Patricia Vetrano - Page 27




                                       - 27 -                                         
                  adjustments the Court can conclude that the                         
                  deficiency is arbitrary and unreasonable.                           
                  Portillo v. Commissioner, 932 F.2d 1128, 1132                       
                  (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Commissioner, 73                        
                  T.C. 394, 396-97, 402 (1979).  Without this                         
                  presumption of correctness the IRS must do more                     
                  than submit its belief that Mr. Vetrano had this                    
                  income.  They did not present any such evidence,                    
                  in fact they presented evidence that Mr. Vetrano                    
                  had no such unreported income through the                           
                  testimony of Mr. Gartland.  A decision in favor                     
                  of both Mr. and Mrs. Vetrano is warranted under                     
                  these facts.                                                        

                  We agree with respondent that the underpayment in each              
             of the years in issue is attributable to the fraud of                    
             Mr. Vetrano.  Respondent established that the portion of                 
             the underpayment in each year attributable to the payments               
             from BMAP is due to fraud.  The record shows that                        
             petitioner engaged in an automobile parts business and                   
             realized substantial income from selling automobile parts                
             to BMAP in each of those years.  Petitioner took steps to                
             conceal the income that he earned from his automobile parts              
             business from his accountant, from his ex-wife, and from                 
             the Internal Revenue Service.  These steps included, among               
             others, failing to maintain or produce books and records                 
             regarding his automobile parts business, conducting his                  
             business and personal affairs almost entirely in cash, and               
             providing false information to his former spouse and to the              
             court in his divorce action.                                             







Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011