- 24 - and not a business purpose, that only one signature was to be required in order for withdrawals to be made from the account, and that the account owner was a trust. In the case of an account’s being opened for a trust as owner of the account, the account application requested informa- tion as to the names and the addresses of the beneficiaries of the trust and whether the trust was a revocable trust or whether it had a pay-on-death designation. Mr. Barmes did not provide that information on any of the account applications that he completed. In a section marked “BACKUP WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATIONS”, the account application requested that the account owner certify under penalties of perjury that the TIN provided on the applica- tion was the correct TIN for that account owner and, if applica- ble, that the account owner certify that such account owner was not subject to backup withholding, was an exempt recipient, and/or was a nonresident alien. In each account application, Mr. Barmes indicated on behalf of the account owner, which in each instance he claimed was a trust, that the TIN provided in such application was the correct TIN for the trust, that the trust was not subject to backup withholding, and that the trust was not a United States person. Mr. Barmes signed each of the account applications that he completed under penalties of perjury, thereby certifying under such penalties that the foregoingPage: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011