Wayne and Pamela Berry - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
               1216 (6th Cir. 1993), involved Sentinel expanded                       
               polyethylene (EPE) recyclers.  However, the EPS                        
               recycler partnerships and the EPE recycler partnerships                
               are essentially identical.  See Davenport Recycling                    
               Associates v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-347, * * *                 
               affd. 220 F.3d 1255, * * * (11th Cir. 2000); see also                  
               Gottsegen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-314 * * *                   
               (involving both the EPE and EPS recyclers); Ulanoff v.                 
               Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-170 * * * (same).                        
          A.  The Private Offering Memorandum                                         
               In Barber v. Commissioner, supra, significant portions of              
          the Whitman offering memorandum were summarized as follows:                 
                    By a private placement offering memorandum dated                  
               September 28, 1982 (the offering memorandum),                          
               subscriptions for 18 limited partnership units in                      
               Whitman were offered by the partnership’s promoter to                  
               potential limited partners at $50,000 per partnership                  
               unit.  Pursuant to the offering memorandum, the limited                
               partners would own 99 percent of Whitman and the                       
               general partner, Sam Winer, would own the remaining 1                  
               percent.  Also pursuant to the offering memorandum,                    
               each limited partner was required to have a net worth                  
               (including residence and personal property) in excess                  
               of $1 million, or net income in excess of $200,000, for                
               each investment unit.                                                  
                    The offering memorandum stated that Winer would                   
               receive $62,000 for administrative and other services                  
               to be paid from the proceeds of the private placement                  
               offering as “management fees”.  The offering memorandum                
               also stated that the partnership would pay “fees of                    
               purchaser representatives and selling commissions” from                
               the proceeds of the offering in an amount equal to 10                  
               percent of the aggregate price of the units.  Thus,                    
               Winer would earn a 10-percent commission upon selling                  
               an interest in the partnership.  In addition, the                      
               offering memorandum stated that Winer could “retain as                 
               additional compensation all amounts not paid as                        
               purchaser representative fees or sales commissions in                  
               connection with the Offering”.                                         
                    The face of the offering memorandum warned, in                    
               bold capital letters, that “THIS OFFERING INVOLVES A                   
               HIGH DEGREE OF RISK”.  The offering memorandum also                    
               warned that “An investment in the partnership involves                 
               a high degree of business and tax risks and should,                    





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011