Zinovy Brodsky - Page 150




                                        - 91 -                                         
          of those checks.44  On the record before us, we find that peti-              
          tioner has failed to carry his burden of establishing that the               
          March 23, 1992 deposit represented a business loan from Mr.                  
          Kroma.                                                                       
               With respect to the May 12, 1992 deposit in question of                 
          $36,000, petitioner contends that $31,167.50 of that deposit,                
          which we have found was derived from Amuke Business Association,             
          represented a business loan from that association.  Petitioner               
          failed to raise as an issue in petitioner’s further trial memo-              
          randum that $31,167.50 of the May 12, 1992 deposit in question               
          represented a business loan from Amuke Business Association.                 
          Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s March 31, 2000 Order, we                
          shall not address that matter.45                                             

               43(...continued)                                                        
          tively.  See our discussion supra note 42.                                   
               44For example, Mr. Kroma could have endorsed both the                   
          $20,000 cashier’s check and the $1,250 check to petitioner, who              
          in turn deposited and/or cashed them.  In this connection, the               
          record shows that on Apr. 28, 1992, petitioner deposited into one            
          of petitioner’s accounts a Bank of America cashier’s check for               
          $12,000 that was payable to Marcel Feldberg.                                 
               45Assuming arguendo that petitioner’s further trial memoran-            
          dum had raised as an issue that $31,167.50 of the May 12, 1992               
          deposit in question represented a business loan from Amuke                   
          Business Association, on the instant record, we find that peti-              
          tioner has failed to carry his burden of establishing that that              
          amount did in fact represent such a loan.  On that record, we                
          have found that the May 12, 1992 deposit was made with a $36,000             
          Bank of America cashier’s check payable to Star Electronics that             
          petitioner purchased with, inter alia, a $31,167.50 check dated              
          May 11, 1992, from Amuke Business Association.  According to                 
          petitioner, the $31,167.50 check represented a business loan that            
          Amuke Business Association made to him for the purchase of                   
          certain jewelry from Star Electronics, but that purchase did not             
                                                              (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011