- 12 - identity of results test in order to show that the Commissioner's determination, requiring it to change from the cash method to the accrual method of accounting, was an abuse of discretion. The Court of Appeals in Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner, 420 F.2d at 356, explained that the substantial identity of results test is a “rigorous standard [that] may occasionally work a harsh result” and that “the standard * * * [the taxpayer] must satisfy is extremely high.” Id. at 356- 357. In Wilkinson-Beane, Inc., the taxpayer failed to demonstrate that the cash method of accounting and accrual method of accounting produced substantial identity of results where differences in gross income resulting from the different methods were $2,094.80 and $4,009.76, respectively, during the years in issue. The court went on to state that “it must be borne in mind that regardless of the accuracy of taxpayer’s cash method in the past, there is no guarantee that the stability of sales, costs, collections and other factors which make for that result will continue in the future.” Id.; see also Ralston Dev. Corp. v. United States, 937 F.2d 510, 513 (10th Cir. 1991) (cash and accrual methods did not achieve substantial identity of results where use of the accrual method increased gross income by $715,515 (157 percent), $467,284 (36 percent), and $739,581 (48 percent)); Tebarco Mech. Corp. v.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011