- 3 - surgical policies, hospital intensive care policies, and accident policies. Petitioner ultimately determined that the insurance policies that she had purchased did not provide the coverage that had been represented. Accordingly, petitioner decided to seek legal redress. In November 1993, petitioner retained the law firm of Olen & McGlothren, P.C. (the Olen law firm) to represent her in prosecuting her claims against Liberty Life. Pursuant to the retainer agreement, petitioner agreed to pay attorney’s fees equal to 40 percent of whatever money was eventually recovered, whether by trial or settlement. Petitioner also agreed to pay court costs and related legal expenses from such money. Thereafter, in 1994, the Olen law firm filed a Complaint on petitioner’s behalf in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama against Liberty Life. Later, in September 1994, an amended complaint was filed. The amended complaint focused on the various insurance policies that petitioner had purchased from Liberty Life. The amended complaint alleged that these insurance policies contained restrictive payment provisions limiting the amount of petitioner’s recovery to benefits available under only one of the policies, such that the other policies were duplicative and worthless.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011