Debra Susan Dickerson - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          allocate proceeds to specific claims and there is no evidence               
          that a specific claim was meant to be singled out, we consider              
          the entire amount taxable.  See Morabito v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 1997-315.                                                             
               In Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995), the                  
          Supreme Court cautioned that there must be a direct link between            
          the personal injury and the recovery of damages for the exclusion           
          in section 104(a)(2) to apply.  In the present case, petitioner             
          has not shown that her claim for mental anguish prompted, to any            
          discernible extent, the settlement proceeds that she received.              
               In agreeing to settle petitioner’s civil action, Liberty               
          Life appears to have been highly motivated by the possibility of            
          an award of punitive damages.  Significantly, the release did not           
          specifically allocate any amount as compensation for personal               
          injury or sickness.  Further, petitioner has not adduced any                
          facts upon which she would rely to prove such an allocation.                
          Under these circumstances, we are unable to find that a specific            
          portion of the settlement was intended to satisfy any potential             
          claim for mental anguish that petitioner might have had.  See,              
          e.g., Ramos v. Davis & Geck, Inc., 224 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2000).             
          As a result, the entire payment is presumptively includable in              
          gross income.  See Taggi v. United States, 35 F.3d 93, 96 (2d               
          Cir. 1994).                                                                 
               In conclusion, petitioner’s amended complaint and the                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011