Debra Susan Dickerson - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          settlement agreement does not specifically state why the                    
          settlement proceeds were paid, we must look at surrounding facts,           
          including the underlying amended complaint, to decide the intent            
          of Liberty Life in entering into the settlement.                            
               A careful examination of the amended complaint demonstrates            
          that the relief requested was not solely for personal injury or             
          sickness.  Thus, the amended complaint included four counts,                
          which asserted claims for detrimental reliance, concealment and             
          suppression, conversion, and beach of fiduciary duty.  The                  
          damages sought for each cause of action were identical in that              
          petitioner sought recovery of an unspecified sum for actual                 
          damages, general damages, punitive damages, and such other                  
          damages as authorized by Alabama law.                                       
               The amended complaint contained no particularized                      
          allegations regarding personal injury or sickness arising from              
          Liberty Life’s conduct.  In fact, the only allegation of any type           
          of personal injury is found in the first cause of action                    
          (regarding detrimental reliance) and that allegation, which is              
          both conclusory and fleeting, reads in its entirety as follows:             
          "Further, the Plaintiff has suffered mental anguish and will so             
          suffer in the future."                                                      
               We observe at this point that the mere mention of emotional            
          harm in a complaint does not, by itself, serve to exclude the               
          recovery from gross income under section 104(a)(2).  Clearly,               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011