Epic Associates 84-III, William C. Griffith, Jr. - Page 20




                                       - 109 -                                        
                  The fair market value of real property is based on                  
             the highest and best use to which the property could be                  
             put on the date of valuation.  See, e.g., Frazee v.                      
             Commissioner, 98 T.C. 554, 563 (1992); Symington v.                      
             Commissioner, 87 T.C. 892, 896 (1986); Stanley Works v.                  
             Commissioner, 87 T.C. 389, 400 (1986).  Generally, the                   
             highest and best use of a parcel of property is the                      
             reasonable and probable use of the property that supports                
             the highest present value.  See Frazee v. Commissioner,                  
             supra at 563; Symington v. Commissioner, supra at 896-897.               
             In determining the highest and best use of the property,                 
             it is necessary to consider the realistic, objective                     
             potential uses for which the property is adaptable and                   
             needed or likely to be needed in the foreseeable future.                 
             See Stanley Works v. Commissioner, supra at 400.  See                    
             generally Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255-256                  
             (1934).                                                                  
                  In the process of establishing the fair market value                
             of an item of property on the basis of its highest and                   
             best use, it is sometimes necessary to consider the most                 
             appropriate market through which the property would change               
             hands from a willing seller to a willing buyer.  See,                    
             e.g., Akers v. Commissioner, 799 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1986),               
             affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-490; Anselmo v. Commissioner, 757                  






Page:  Previous  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011