- 106 - EA 84-III Respondent's Address Loan Amount Value Loan � Value 5419 Heronwood Dr. $51,300 $58,000 88.45 5411 Heronwood Dr. 61,75065,000 95.00 3518 Tower Hill La. 60,550 55,000 110.09 12347 Northcliffe Manor Dr. 55,57545,000 123.50 13066 Clarewood Dr. 54,150 48,000 112.81 6351 S. Briar Bayou Dr.58,425 47,000 124.31 12103 Kingslake Forest Dr. 57,47546,000 124.95 12107 Kingslake Forest Dr. 47,97538,000 126.25 12111 Kingslake Forest Dr. 53,20040,000 133.00 12115 Kingslake Forest Dr. 60,80052,000 116.92 12231 Carola Forest Dr.56,050 54,000 103.80 4850 W. Ferret 67,450 71,200 94.73 4107 Medical Dr. (Condo.)56,950 56,400 100.98 13739 Earlywood Dr. 60,800 57,600 105.56 6402 Ridgecreek Dr. 60,800 55,950 108.67 Reflections Condos 1 2,590,200 1 2,100,000123.34 (40 Units) Total 3,453,450 2,889,150 119.530 1 This is the aggregate amount for all 40 condominium units in the Reflections. Respondent's position is that the promissory notes issued by EA 84-III, comprising 55 of the 106 notes mentioned above, should be disregarded for tax purposes because the aggregate nonrecourse debt represented by those notes exceeds the value of the properties by 19.53 percent. The above schedules show that respondent tests whether the principal amount of the indebtedness exceeds the value of the property securing it in the aggregate, rather than loan by loan. If the value comparison were made loan by loan, most of the loans issued with respect to the single-family residences would approximate the value of the property securing the loan, even using respondent's values. For example, in the case of the 12 single-family residences acquired by EA 83-XII, as shownPage: Previous 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011