- 110 - F.2d 1208 (11th Cir. 1985), affg. 80 T.C. 872 (1983); cf. United States v. Cartwright, supra at 551-552. In identifying what market to use in estimating the value of an item of property, we have looked to the regulations promulgated under the estate and gift taxes, see sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs.; sec. 25.2512-1, Gift Tax Regs., which provide that the fair market value of an item of property is the sales price of the item in the market in which such item is "most commonly sold to the public." See, e.g., Goldstein v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 535, 544 (1987); Lio v. Commissioner, supra at 66; Orth v. Commissioner, 813 F.2d 837 (7th Cir. 1987); Skripak v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 285, 321-322 (1985); Anselmo v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. at 881-882. In applying the estate and gift tax regulations to ascertain the fair market value of an item of property for purposes of computing the amount of a charitable contribution deduction, the Court of Appeals in Anselmo v. Commissioner, 757 F.2d at 1214, noted the following: Rules governing valuations for charitable contributions of property are distinguishable from valuations in the estate and gift context because the taxpayer has the opposite incentives in the two situations: the taxpayer wants to reduce the value of property for estate and gift tax purposes but, as here, the taxpayer wishes to inflate the value of property for charitablePage: Previous 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011