Epic Associates 84-III, William C. Griffith, Jr. - Page 22




                                       - 110 -                                        
             F.2d 1208 (11th Cir. 1985), affg. 80 T.C. 872 (1983); cf.                
             United States v. Cartwright, supra at 551-552.  In                       
             identifying what market to use in estimating the value of                
             an item of property, we have looked to the regulations                   
             promulgated under the estate and gift taxes, see sec.                    
             20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs.; sec. 25.2512-1, Gift Tax                 
             Regs., which provide that the fair market value of an item               
             of property is the sales price of the item in the market                 
             in which such item is "most commonly sold to the public."                
             See, e.g., Goldstein v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 535, 544                   
             (1987); Lio v. Commissioner, supra at 66; Orth v.                        
             Commissioner, 813 F.2d 837 (7th Cir. 1987); Skripak v.                   
             Commissioner, 84 T.C. 285, 321-322 (1985); Anselmo v.                    
             Commissioner, 80 T.C. at 881-882.                                        
                  In applying the estate and gift tax regulations to                  
             ascertain the fair market value of an item of property                   
             for purposes of computing the amount of a charitable                     
             contribution deduction, the Court of Appeals in Anselmo                  
             v. Commissioner, 757 F.2d at 1214, noted the following:                  

                       Rules governing valuations for charitable                      
                  contributions of property are distinguishable                       
                  from valuations in the estate and gift context                      
                  because the taxpayer has the opposite incentives                    
                  in the two situations: the taxpayer wants to                        
                  reduce the value of property for estate and gift                    
                  tax purposes but, as here, the taxpayer wishes                      
                  to inflate the value of property for charitable                     






Page:  Previous  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011