- 156 - (1983); Feldman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-17, affd. 20 F.3d 1128 (11th Cir. 1994). Therefore, in the instant cases, we look to the actions of the general partner, EPIC, to determine whether both of the partnerships are subject to section 183. The determination whether an activity is engaged in for profit is to be made by reference to objective standards, taking into account all of the facts and circumstances of each case. See sec. 1.183-2(a), Income Tax Regs. No one factor is determinative in making this determination. See sec. 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs. Greater weight is to be given to objective facts than to the taxpayer's statement of his or her interest. See sec. 1.183-2(a), Income Tax Regs. As a preliminary matter, we note that none of the parties to these cases contends that either partnership conducted more than one activity. See generally sec. 1.183-1(d)(3), Income Tax Regs. For example, no party contends that the holding of the residential properties for appreciation and the renting of those properties by either partnership were separate activities for purposes of section 183. The regulations list the following nine factors that should be taken into account in determining whether anPage: Previous 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011