- 42 - on check 3009 where he writes in the date of 12/19/90, and writes out reimbursement, and then $6,500 annual. * * * * * * * It's the check stub that I'm referring to. The check-–the original check was returned to Dr. Carey Strom. There is my writing on this register and in addition to that, Dr. Strom, in aggregate, paid me, in 1990, $28,560 for-–that is-–there are two payments to me at least equal that amount. This amount represents $26,200. There was also other checks representing $2,300 that reflected in income. Petitioner summarized his testimony regarding this matter as follows: Getting back to returns and allowances for 1990, I just have one point. On December 19th, 1990, Dr. Strom paid me the $26,700, of which 6,500 was fees and the rest was reimbursement. That was attributable, and this was our agreement, this is my testimony, the reimburse- ment component was attributable to taxes paid to Beverly Hills, the City of Beverly Hills in September of that year of $2,679. Withholding taxes or payroll taxes the entity owed that I paid on October 1st of that year, 1990, of $12,000 and it contemplated me paying state unemployment tax-–state employment taxes of $7,000 on December 31st, 1990, which was subsequent to the payment that was made on December 19th, 1990. You have checks that I paid all those three amounts. That's all I wish to say about that. And I believe that the total amount was an advance, aside from the $6,500 fee, and that these other amounts were just paid as a flow- through.Page: Previous 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011