- 12 - member. Care was licensed to operate an HMO in Utah. In 1985, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) recognized Care as a federally qualified HMO. In 1985, Care filed with respondent an application for recognition as an organization that is exempt from taxation pursuant to section 501(c)(3). In June 1999, respondent denied Care’s application for tax-exempt status. 2. IHC Group, Inc. In July 1991, petitioner organized Group as a nonprofit affiliate for the purpose of establishing a federally qualified medical group model HMO. Petitioner was Group’s sole corporate member. 4(...continued) obtain insurance: (1) for the cost of providing a member with more than $5,000 in basic health services for any one year; (2) for the cost of basic health services provided to a member by a source outside the HMO due to an emergency; and (3) for not more than 90 percent of the amount by which its costs for any fiscal year exceeds 115 percent of its income. Additionally, the section states that HMOs may enter into arrangements under which physicians and/or health care institutions assume all or part of the risk on a prospective basis for the provision to enrollees of basic health services. Petitioner organized IHC Care, Inc., and IHC Group, Inc. (discussed below) as federally qualified HMOs to take advantage of marketing opportunities presented under the so-called dual choice mandate codified under 42 U.S.C. sec. 300e-9 (1976), which required certain employers (generally those with more than 25 employees) to offer their employees the option of enrolling in a federally qualified HMO.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011