- 16 - Petitioner entered into some form of written agreement with all enrollees specifying the premium charge and the medical services to which the enrollee would be entitled. Petitioner entered into master group contracts with all employers offering its health plans. Thereafter, during annual open enrollment periods, employees were permitted to enroll in the health plan and select the benefit package of his or her choice. Although petitioner did not limit its enrollment based upon pre-existing medical conditions, certain plans excluded some pre- existing conditions from full coverage during the first 12 months of membership. Petitioner applied an adjusted community rating methodology to determine premiums for individual and small employer group enrollees, adjusting its rates for risk factors such as age and gender.5 Petitioner relied upon past claims experience to determine premiums for large employer group enrollees. B. Physician Services Petitioner did not employ a significant number of physicians.6 Petitioner fulfilled its obligation to arrange for its enrollees to receive physician services by contracting with a 5 See 42 C.F.R. sec. 417.104(b) (1995), which sets forth the requirements for acceptable community rating systems for federally qualified HMOs. 6 Petitioner never employed more than five physicians at a time, and these physicians were hired for the limited purpose of conducting health fairs for enrollees.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011