David J. and Jo Dena Johnson - Page 22




                                        - 22 -                                         
          PETITIONER:    Well, then I would suppose that the only action               
                         you could take would be to honor the request to               
                         dismiss for lack of jurisdiction * * * and then I             
                         would have to appeal to district court.                       
               On this record, I am not convinced petitioners petitioned               
          this Court in an attempt to delay the proceedings.  If a taxpayer            
          instituted the proceedings for delay, the proper action is to                
          sanction the taxpayer pursuant to section 6673(a) as we warned in            
          Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000).  See also                 
          Davis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-87 (imposing a $4,000                 
          penalty pursuant to section 6673(a) for frivolous and groundless             
          arguments).                                                                  
               LARO, J., agrees with this concurring opinion.                          




























Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011