Estate of Cyril I. Magnin, Deceased, Donald Isaac Magnin, Executor - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          corporation, Cyril would create a trust of the proceeds he                  
          received, under the terms of which the income of said trust would           
          belong to Cyril for his life, and the principal would be                    
          distributed upon his death to his three children.                           
               Prior to the 1951 Agreement, Joseph and Cyril were concerned           
          about the future of their businesses.  Cyril had begun dating               
          women after the death of his wife, Anna, and Joseph wanted to               
          ensure that the business would remain in the family and that                
          Cyril’s shares of stock would not go to one of these women.                 
          Cyril, on the other hand, was concerned about control of the                
          business upon Joseph’s death.  Control of the business was very             
          important to Cyril; he saw control of the business as a means to            
          enhance his social, political, and business position in the                 
          community.  Cyril also feared that if he had to share control               
          with his children, he might someday be fired by them.                       
               As of October 31, 1951, JM had issued and outstanding                  
          255,174 shares of stock, consisting of 72,717 shares of preferred           
          stock and 182,457 shares of common stock, all of which had voting           
          rights.2  The shareholdings of Joseph and Cyril in JM were as               


               2The articles of incorporation of Newman, Magnin & Co.                 
          (subsequently JM) were silent as to the voting rights of the                
          preferred stock until a 1968 amendment, which expressly provided            
          that the preferred stock was entitled to voting rights equal to             
          those of the common stock.  However, it appears that prior to the           
          1968 amendment, the preferred stock was considered to be voting             
          by the corporation and that the holders of the preferred stock              
          actually did exercise voting rights.                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011