- 15 - appropriate standard for valuation purposes8 and agreed that the valuation determination in the notice of deficiency is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See id. However, the Court of Appeals held that the previously mentioned footnote in our prior opinion did not provide sufficient analysis for it to review whether Cyril received less than adequate and full consideration pursuant to the October 31, 1951, agreement and instructed us to explain how we determined the value of the consideration that Cyril transferred and received. See id. The Court of Appeals remanded the case for findings that explain how we determined the values of the respective property interests both transferred and received by Cyril. See id. OPINION A decedent’s gross estate generally includes the value of all property interests transferred by the decedent during his life in which he retained for his life the right to the possession, enjoyment, or income from the property. See sec. 2036(a).9 However, if the property interest transferred by the 8In our prior opinion, we held that the value of what Cyril received should be determined by ascertaining “the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.” Estate of Magnin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-25; sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs. 9Sec. 2036(a) provides, in pertinent part: (continued...)Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011