- 21 - In the instant case, both parties’ experts determined the overall value of JM and Speciality using a combination of a market comparable analysis and a discounted future cash-flow (DCF) analysis.12 1. Respondent’s Expert Respondent relied on the report and testimony of an expert appraiser, Mr. Stewart. The parties agree that Mr. Stewart qualifies as an expert for purposes of this case. Mr. Stewart determined the value of the property interests in issue in the following manner. He determined the values of the preferred stocks of JM and Specialty by comparing them to five companies which he felt had similar characteristics. Mr. Stewart then valued JM and Specialty using a market approach. To determine the overall values of the common stocks under his market approach, Mr. Stewart subtracted the value he assigned to the preferred stocks from the values he assigned to JM and Specialty and then applied a marketability discount.13 Mr. 11(...continued) standard. 12Throughout their reports, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Browning chose to round off certain numbers while being specific as to other numbers. As a result, our analysis of their reports and the figures we use are generally rounded off with specific numbers used in certain instances. 13Mr. Stewart did not apply a minority discount because, in his opinion, the market approach already produces a per-share value for a minority interest.Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011