- 5 - cost of goods sold reflected the industry average for stale and damaged returns, and not the actual amount returned to IBC. Petitioners also claimed Schedule C deductions for home office expenses in the respective amounts of $7,919 and $9,433 for 1996 and 1997. Petitioner claimed the following deductions related to his vehicles on Schedule C: Claimed Deduction 1996 1997 Car & truck expenses $2,480 $2,559 Taxes & licenses —-- 2,152 Interest (other) 2,479 1,215 Depreciation 2,952 3,621 Sec. 179 expenses —-- 10,000 On his Federal income tax returns, petitioner attributed a business use for the vehicles of 71.12 percent for 1996 and 63.74 percent for 1997. Respondent determined that petitioner was a common-law employee and, therefore, not permitted to report income and expenses on Schedule C. Respondent also determined that petitioner is not entitled to any reduction for cost of goods sold because petitioner was not in the business of selling baked goods and, in any event, petitioner failed to substantiate any purchases. Respondent also contends that since petitioner was an employee, petitioners do not qualify for the home office deductions, as the home office was not maintained for the convenience of the employer. Respondent disallowed all of the Schedule C deductions because the expenses were not ordinary andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011