- 9 - importance, though not exclusive. See Atlantic Coast Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 76 F. Supp. 627, 630 (E.D.S.C. 1948). We must examine both the right of control and the control actually exercised by the potential employer. See Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States, 135 F.2d 715, 717 (2d Cir. 1943); deTorres v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-161. The amount of control necessary to find an employer-employee relationship varies with different occupations. See United States v. W.M. Webb, Inc., 397 U.S. 179, 192-193 (1970); Reece v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-335. We discuss below the factors considered to decide whether petitioner was a common-law employee or an independent contractor. A. Degree of Control IBC controlled the extent of petitioner’s territory. IBC required that petitioner deliver goods to certain customers on specific days of the week. IBC dictated the hours of work, compensation, and leave. IBC required petitioner to punch a time clock when he began and ended a workday at IBC’s place of business. Petitioner needed IBC’s permission to take leave. B. Investment in Facilities IBC paid for and supplied the goods petitioner delivered. IBC provided petitioner with his delivery vehicle, and IBC paidPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011