- 10 - which could be conducted largely by telephone conversations, the viewing of videotapes, and so forth. Petitioner accepted a job with Intellicall in 1995 because that company provided petitioner with a flexible work schedule that was conducive to her health condition. For example, petitioner worked 4 hours at the office and 4 hours at home each day. At Intellicall, petitioner was involved in promoting a prepaid phone card program in the nonprofit sports marketing area. Petitioner's background in fund raising and sports marketing was an asset, and, additionally, Intellicall did not restrict petitioner's ability to conduct outside business activities. However, petitioner worked for only 1 year and was forced to return to total disability status in 1996. Petitioner underwent her third back surgery in 1997. Petitioner realized that, in order to generate a profit, it would be necessary to make a dramatic change to the business activities conducted through BRVC that would be suitable with her seemingly chronic health problems. Consequently, petitioner began a prepaid phone card marketing and promotion business through BRVC. Through this activity, as best as the Court understands it, petitioner located corporate sponsors in the sports field to pay BRVC for the privilege of having their company's products or services advertised on the face of prepaid phone cards, which, in turn, petitioner sold to the generalPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011