Ruth N. Nelson - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          tax benefit from the deduction of State income taxes in a prior             
          year; i.e., the year for which the refund was received.  See sec.           
          111(a).  Moreover, a taxpayer is not required to include in                 
          income any portion of a refund that did not result in a reduction           
          of taxes in the year the State income taxes were deducted.  See             
          sec. 1.111-1(a), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioner complied with this            
          rule of law on her 1992 and 1993 Federal income tax returns.  On            
          her 1992 Federal income tax return, petitioner deducted $2,658 on           
          Schedule A for State income taxes.  During 1993, petitioner                 
          received a $1,227 refund of her 1992 State income taxes.  On her            
          1993 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported $729 as a               
          taxable refund of State income taxes.  Petitioner reported only             
          $729 of the total refund in her 1993 income because her itemized            
          deductions for 1992 exceeded her allowable standard deduction for           
          that year by only $729.  Thus, the maximum tax benefit received             
          by petitioner in 1992 for the deduction of State income taxes was           
          $729 and that is the amount she was required to and did in fact             
          report as income on her 1993 return.4                                       
               When respondent determined that BRVC was an activity not               
          engaged in for profit for 1992, respondent computationally                  
          disallowed petitioner's 1992 itemized deductions in their                   


               4    See sec. 1.111-1(b)(2)(ii) and (3), Income Tax Regs.;             
          Prewitt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-24.  Respondent adopted            
          this rationale in Rev. Rul. 93-75, 1993-2 C.B. 63.                          






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011