Juan Rodriguez - Page 24




                                        - 24 -                                        
             under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to file a return                    
             unless such failure is due to a reasonable cause and not                 
             willful neglect.  See sec. 6651(a)(1).  The amount of the                
             addition to tax is 5 percent of the tax required to be                   
             shown on the return, if the return is filed within a month               
             of the due date, with an additional 5 percent for each                   
             additional month or fraction thereof during which the                    
             failure continues, not exceeding 25 percent in the                       
             aggregate.  See id.  Petitioner bears the burden of proving              
             that he is not liable for the addition.  See Rule 142(a).                
                  Petitioner argues as follows:                                       

                       * * *  Of the $100,000.00 the petitioner                       
                  received from the FBI, ninety percent (90%), or                     
                  $90,000.00 was received after petitioner had                        
                  worked undercover for the FBI.  It was agreed                       
                  that this payment of $100,000.00 would be used                      
                  to pay for the enormous cost of relocating the                      
                  petitioner and his family to Puerto Rico.                           
                  Although it is true the FBI did not have the                        
                  authority to determine the taxability of this                       
                  payment, it is certainly reasonable for                             
                  petitioner to rely on the FBI's position and                        
                  statements regarding this payment.  Respondent                      
                  correctly states that is the burden of the                          
                  petitioner to establish this fact.  However,                        
                  due to the highly sensitive nature of the                           
                  undercover operation (which is ongoing), it can                     
                  hardly be expected for the petitioner to produce                    
                  as witnesses the FBI agents responsible for                         
                  leading the petitioner to believe this payment                      
                  would not be considered taxable income.  It is                      
                  the position of the petitioner that this                            
                  $100,000.00 payment is not fully taxable.  If                       
                  plausible disagreement as to the taxability of                      
                  this income exists to this day, it can surely be                    
                  said the petitioner had a reasonable expectation                    





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011