Trans World Travel - Page 24




                                       - 24 -                                         
                    JAMES GIBBS:  I would say yes.                                    
               The truth of the matter is that James and John simply had no           
          interest in what they were signing when it came to tax-related              
          matters.  For all intents and purposes, they had even delegated             
          their signature authority to Jaffe.                                         
          B. Ratification                                                             
               If, on the other hand, Jaffe acted without authority in                
          signing and filing the petition, petitioner contends that the               
          Court lacked jurisdiction to enter the stipulated decision                  
          because petitioner never ratified such unauthorized act.  Again,            
          we disagree.                                                                
               A finding of ratification under Illinois agency law is a               
          complex, fact-intensive inquiry.  A wholly unauthorized act may             
          nevertheless be made valid by a subsequent ratification, in that            
          such subsequent assent would confirm what was originally an                 
          unauthorized and illegal act.  See Hefner v. Vandolah, 62 Ill.              
          483, 485 (1872); see also Middle W. Tel. Co. v. U.S. Fire Ins.              
          Co., 296 Ill. App. 260, 265 (1938).  As applicable herein,                  
          ratification means retroactive adoption of an unauthorized                  
          signature by the person whose name is signed.                               
               Ratification may be found from express statements or it may            
          be inferred from the surrounding circumstances, for example,                
          where the principal takes a position inconsistent with                      
          nonaffirmation of the transaction, see Hofner v. Glenn Ingram &             






Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011