- 28 - Thus, John either knew or should have known that he was concluding a case that was in litigation. See id. By signing and dating the stipulated decision, without even asking for clarification about the nature of the document, John ratified the filing of the petition. See, e.g., Chalet Ford, Inc. v. Red Top Parking, Inc., supra. C. Conclusion In summary, we hold that petitioner failed to satisfy its burden of proving that the filing of the petition by Jaffe was unauthorized. We also hold that, in any event, subsequent conduct by James and John ratified Jaffe’s action in filing the petition. Accordingly, the Court had jurisdiction, and it properly entered the stipulated decision on March 26, 1997. In order to give effect to our holdings, An appropriate order denying petitioner’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate will be issued.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Last modified: May 25, 2011