John E. Wall - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         

               Demco’s net income fell sharply during the 2 years between             
          the redemptions and the gifts.6                                             
                                       OPINION                                        
               Preliminary Observations                                               
               Before discussing our findings and analysis of value, we               
          make some observations about the cases at hand and about                    
          valuation cases generally.                                                  
               First, the parties’ original positions, as set forth in the            
          gift tax returns and the statutory notices, were not very far               




               6 Petitioners asserted before trial that the redemptions and           
          the sale of the media division had “never been properly raised as           
          issues by respondent”.  Petitioners objected on that ground to              
          our consideration of any facts or issues relating to those                  
          transactions.                                                               
               Notwithstanding their objections, petitioners introduced               
          evidence at trial concerning the redemptions and the media                  
          division sale.  Petitioners’ briefs do not mention any objection            
          to our consideration of this evidence.  Moreover, petitioners’              
          briefs contain extensive proposed findings of fact concerning               
          both the redemptions and the media division sale; they also set             
          forth petitioners’ arguments on the effect those transactions               
          should have on our determination of the fair market value of                
          Demco stock.  As a result, petitioners have waived their                    
          objections.  See Stringer v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 693, 706                 
          (1985), affd. without published opinion 789 F.2d 917 (4th Cir.              
          1986); Estate of Miller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-416                
          (objection to admission of testimony held waived because                    
          objecting party’s brief proposed finding of fact and set forth              
          argument based on that testimony).  We also note that the                   
          original report of petitioners’ expert Ms. Walker discussed both            
          the redemptions and the media division sale.  Petitioners                   
          submitted a copy of that report with their gift tax returns and             
          rely on it in the cases at hand.                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011